Thursday, June 8, 2017

A disgruntled employee fails to make the case against his old boss

Via Billy

 Former FBI Director James Comey testifies before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, June 8, 2017.  (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

During Thursday’s showdown Senate Intelligence Committee hearing, fired FBI Director James B. Comey came across as less as a fearless crusader for the truth and more as a disgruntled employee upset with the boss who unceremoniously let him go.

He deliberately shared his memos about his talks with President Trump with his friend Daniel Richman, a former FBI agent and Columbia Law School professor, explicitly hoping it would lead to the appointment of a special counsel, a ploy that succeeded brilliantly. The decision to share the sensitive memos is troubling because of Mr. Comey’s “unauthorized disclosure of privileged communications,” as Mr. Trump’s lawyer, Marc Kasowitz, was quick to point out.

Strangely, Mr. Comey decided not to share that same memo with Attorney General Jeff Sessions or the acting deputy attorney general, holding his information close while waiting for the right moment to strike. He felt “defamed” by the Trump administration and took direct action against the president.

This was Mr. Comey’s personal revenge after losing his job.

2 comments:

  1. The dishonorable Mr. Comey needs to be reminded that he had done his job, he would still have his job (and his reputation). He played politics with it and lost. Further more he has damaged the reputation of the FBI beyond repair. The only difference between the FBI and any other criminal organization is that the FBI can engage in their criminal activity legally.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The only difference between the FBI and any other criminal organization is that the FBI can engage in their criminal activity legally.

      As many other agencies also do.

      Delete